<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Joind.in</title>
        <link>https://joind.in/</link>
        <description>Joind.in</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
    </channel>
    
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: Building an Anti-CMS (and how it's changed our web team)</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</link>
                <description>Very interesting talk. I liked your take on the classic CMS and enjoyed listening to some of the things you've done with your system. Overall a very enjoyable talk.</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: Building an Anti-CMS (and how it's changed our web team)</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</link>
                <description>Some interesting concepts about how content writers are not interested in anything except the content they write for the pages, however the whole concept of Anti-CMS still manages to elude me. To me utilising a framework of sorts to create separate interfaces for content writers is still providing a CMS style structure for them, its just how you utilise that same content across different websites that removes the typical CMS feel from the whole process.

Great presentation though and I will definitely be looking at a few of my sites again :)</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: Building an Anti-CMS (and how it's changed our web team)</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</link>
                <description>Well delivered talk. I was unclear how the problems levelled at CMS in general were applicable though - they seem more about how you implement your site, not necessarily about what framework you were using.</description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: Building an Anti-CMS (and how it's changed our web team)</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</link>
                <description>I was considering giving this talk a 3 based on the fact that I was not expecting the &quot;use a framework&quot; talk that we got - however I realise that the introduction clearly mentions this, and it's my fail for not reading it! In fact, based on that, Michael delivered everything he said he would - and whilst not going technical enough for me, it was presented well.</description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: Building an Anti-CMS (and how it's changed our web team)</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</link>
                <description>We've had similar experience using Symfony to deliver &quot;content-managed&quot; sites to clients so I understand where this was coming from. I dont think the presentation lived up to the title - which was by far the most intriguing in the conference, perhaps just a good old fashioned conclusion at the end of the benefits of model driven content managements would have helped? </description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: Building an Anti-CMS (and how it's changed our web team)</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/621</link>
                <description>A well presented talk, always interesting to see what approaches others use to fulfill certain requirements.</description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        </rss>

