<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Joind.in</title>
        <link>https://joind.in/</link>
        <description>Joind.in</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
    </channel>
    
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: What’s New, What’s Hot in PHP 5.3</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</link>
                <description>good to know what's coming up.. some slides a bit confusing with multiple reuses of same variables in examples for different things.. aparat from that good clean presentation</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: What’s New, What’s Hot in PHP 5.3</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</link>
                <description>A little bit rushed on the odd topic, but I suppose that was the idea  :-)</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: What’s New, What’s Hot in PHP 5.3</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</link>
                <description>Useful code snippets - even if we're not totally sold on the idea of \ and namespaces ;)

Obviously plenty of content, and the speaker answered the questions very well (With additional slides etc)</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title>Comment on: What’s New, What’s Hot in PHP 5.3</title>
                <guid>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</guid>
                <link>https://joind.in/talk/view/84</link>
                <description>A good overview. I got the idea though that, given a bit more time, things could've been made more clear.</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
            </item>
        </rss>

