M1.05 - Online Admissions Review – How to customize an admissions document viewer so that no one misses paper

Robert LeHeup (21.Feb.2011 at 08:45)
Talk at SACRAO 2011 (English - US)

Rating: 4 of 5

SESSION ROOM: ATLANTA 3

The University of Texas at Austin’s admissions review processes have been costly due to printing, distributing, and processing paper documents. We’ll present an online document viewing and review processing system which has curtailed these costs and made the admissions review process much easier for the reviewers and their managers.

Who are you?

Claim talk

By clicking this button you are declaring that you are the speaker responsible for it and a claim request will be sent to the administrator of the event.

If the claim is approved you will be able to edit the information for this talk.

Are you sure?

 
Comments closed.

Comments

Speaker comment:

21.Feb.2011 at 09:42 by Robert LeHeup (16 comments)

Spoke well--very engaging.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 10:12 by BCA (3 comments)

Great

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:09 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:10 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:10 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:10 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Good solid brief & platform for Ideals

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:11 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Too technical for my needs-

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:11 by paper 36 (139 comments)

None.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:11 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Hi-tech discussion at a users level. Very well done.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:12 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Great presentation! Very efficient process!

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:12 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Very interesting!

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:13 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Very informative. Thanks

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:13 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Great job!

Rating: 2 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:14 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Session focused on individualized execution and few strategies/tactics to apply at institutions other than UT Austin. Presenter is very knowledgable.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:15 by paper 36 (139 comments)

It was a good session as we are trying to move in this direction. I thought there was a software, but they built this from the ground up. Would have been nice to have software suggestions.

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:16 by paper 36 (139 comments)

The description for the class was different than what the session was about. They have on site workers reviewing applications. However I was under the impression that I could learn something new as far as in home reviews.

Rating: 2 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:17 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Wow! Neat system-seems like info would be better for IT staff.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:17 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Good computer termilongy & "things to think about" in developing a good system.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 10:18 by paper 36 (139 comments)

Very interested concept I can apply in my workplace. I learned a lot. I suggest you spend less time in statistics (at the beginning) and say less "I'll talk about it later" other than that you did great!

© Joind.in 2014