very engaging, but a little lack of interactivity and the lack of Q&A due to overrun was a down point. Smylers Very energetic and seeminly passionate on the subject. :)
very engaging, but a little lack of interactivity and the lack of Q&A due to overrun was a down point. Smylers Very energetic and seeminly passionate on the subject. :)
Agree about the enthusiasm, and although the topic didn't really have anything to do with PHP specifically, still very relative to what we all do and how things will be in the future.
Highly interesting, although somewhat speculative, talk about HTML 5. Smylers was enthusiastic and covered the subject very well. Put across a good case for having HTML 5. Answered the question I had at the end without the need for me to ask it! :)
Comments
Comments are closed.
very engaging, but a little lack of interactivity and the lack of Q&A due to overrun was a down point. Smylers Very energetic and seeminly passionate on the subject. :)
very engaging, but a little lack of interactivity and the lack of Q&A due to overrun was a down point. Smylers Very energetic and seeminly passionate on the subject. :)
Agree about the enthusiasm, and although the topic didn't really have anything to do with PHP specifically, still very relative to what we all do and how things will be in the future.
Thanks Smylers,
Great talk, informative and down to earth.
Cheers,
Chris
Highly interesting, although somewhat speculative, talk about HTML 5. Smylers was enthusiastic and covered the subject very well. Put across a good case for having HTML 5. Answered the question I had at the end without the need for me to ask it! :)