PHPSW: Code Quality, March 2018
14 Mar 2018
at Brightpearl
Talk comments
A thorough and well planned talk!
To make a petty suggestion I thought it was heavy to testing, and I’d have liked to see more about code review, and how to make good suggestions.
Good, professionally crafted talk. Easy to follow, easy to listen to. One suggestion would be to include cleaner code examples with better highlighting as the ones in the talk we're a bit harder to read.
10/10
Very informative talk. Great primer for those yet to implement the concepts covered and good suggestions and encouragement for those of us already trying to do so.
Could benefit from more concrete real-world examples, but fully understand given the breadth of the subjects covered and the time constraints why this is not possible.
Loads of good topics covered here. I guess the only problem is that, with so much covered, you weren't able to go into much detail. Maybe you need to come back and do some more detailed talks? Thanks.
Good valuable points. Couldn't agree more.
Really interesting talk, liked references for further reading/watching on a the subject and how it covered not only code but also processes.
Perhaps some areas could be more concise
Very informative talk and well humoured making it all the more enjoyable to listen to. Possibly a little too long though. Other than that very well done. Thanks.
Very informative talk covering a lot of things but in a engaging style to keep my attention. I’m looking forward to the slides so I can get dive into some of the areas in more detail.
Insightful speaker - will look out for more of his talks
A great talk with lots of useful ideas for how to improve quality. It is an opinionated talk but that allowed James to be very detailed in a wide range of areas. A little bit of help as to how to convert other team members and other people who are less inclined to think the same way would be useful.
Amazing talk with some great analogies and descriptions. Only downside was that the slides were lacking information for people who are better at absorbing information visually than audibly.