Although smaller groups would be beneficial and communication would be improved,
this was spot on.
Everyone was involved (in their own way) and I know I got a lot just by listening to other people's problems and solutions.
The thing that Miro pointed out was that we discussed DDD more than needed
(but that's very debatable surrounding how DDD, as a theme, is very wide).
Also on the other hand, we have a lot more themes for future open discussions.
Maybe we should discuss 2 topics per meeting? That + presentation (or two) would suffice.
To the 'open discussion' thingy I give 5 stars, as it is the way to improve upon these meetings!
Comments
Comments are closed.
I love the concept, for a 5* it should have been a smaller group to improve communication and participation
I semi agree with Miro (over there) here.
Although smaller groups would be beneficial and communication would be improved,
this was spot on.
Everyone was involved (in their own way) and I know I got a lot just by listening to other people's problems and solutions.
The thing that Miro pointed out was that we discussed DDD more than needed
(but that's very debatable surrounding how DDD, as a theme, is very wide).
Also on the other hand, we have a lot more themes for future open discussions.
Maybe we should discuss 2 topics per meeting? That + presentation (or two) would suffice.
To the 'open discussion' thingy I give 5 stars, as it is the way to improve upon these meetings!