the subject was interesting, but very basic talk, and some information not true (e.g. Solr is not the only one based on Lucene, Elastic is another one).
It'd be better a comparison using the same metrics
- velocity of indexing (with real results)
- search velocity, including velocity during indexing
- additional features (facet etc..)
- documentation and avg time taken to learn
or the result was "this one is fast, the other is not documented, etc... not helping in selecting one
Comments
Comments are closed.
Bit dry but informative and useful. It was good to hear someone doing a professional research on current search solutions.
the subject was interesting, but very basic talk, and some information not true (e.g. Solr is not the only one based on Lucene, Elastic is another one).
It'd be better a comparison using the same metrics
- velocity of indexing (with real results)
- search velocity, including velocity during indexing
- additional features (facet etc..)
- documentation and avg time taken to learn
or the result was "this one is fast, the other is not documented, etc... not helping in selecting one
after the talk I had info that I had already