M1.06 - Registrar's Tool Kit - Panel Session

Brad E. Barron, Thomas Donohoe, Barbara Wilson (21.Feb.2011 at 08:45)
Talk at SACRAO 2011 (English - US)

Rating: 4 of 5

SESSION ROOM: CAPITOL SOUTH

This session is an opportunity for Registrar personnel to share "what works" and what "doesn't work" in their day to day operations.

Who are you?

Claim talk

By clicking this button you are declaring that you are the speaker responsible for it and a claim request will be sent to the administrator of the event.

If the claim is approved you will be able to edit the information for this talk.

Are you sure?

 
Comments closed.

Comments

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:01 by Paper 20

very good networking and sharing. Good presenters.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:01 by Paper 20

interactive group involvement

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:01 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:02 by Paper 20

good information on how others operate

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:02 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:02 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:02 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:02 by Paper 20

good concept. keep working on it. Liked the idea that this was meant to help network with each other.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:03 by Paper 20

great interaction and list development.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:03 by Paper 20

nice interactive discussion; great meeting people early on.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:04 by Paper 20

very enjoyable. but a lot of time was spent gathering information and not so much time spent evaluating the best practices.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:04 by Paper 20

a good review for processes. the only complaint is it was only an hour.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:05 by Paper 20

need more time for q & A.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:05 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:05 by Paper 20

this was a really great place to sit and learn what others offices are doing. Great conversation. Great communication.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:05 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:06 by Paper 20

i came away with some new ideas to look at for the future. thanks.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:06 by Paper 20

good discussion and interaction. speak louder.

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:06 by Paper 20

dissapointing.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:07 by Paper 20

good conversation. perhaps too broad.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:07 by Paper 20

some nice interaction. not enough time.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:07 by Paper 20

not enough time for the material to be covered.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:07 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:08 by Paper 20

good interactive session. Needed more time.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:08 by Paper 20

great discussion and tips.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:08 by Paper 20

good idea to brainstorm reg offic functions but would like to see more ideas take aways to be discussed.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:08 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:08 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:09 by Paper 20

excellent round table and conversation works best.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:09 by Paper 20

not what was expected.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:09 by Paper 20

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:09 by Paper 20

ineresting delivery

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:10 by Paper 20

the session was helpful

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:10 by Paper 20

room set-up was not conducive to activity. overall, lecture was interesting.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:10 by Paper 20

more open discussions regarding topics.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:11 by Paper 20

session description not consistent with actual presentatin. Presentations was less focused on "how to" and "tips" and more an inventory of what the reg office does and is responsible for.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:12 by Paper 20

Not what I expected but I ended up enjoying it.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:12 by Paper 20

loved the interaction with other attendees throughout the presentationn. not long enough. Always interesting to hear what other schools are doing.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:13 by Paper 20

very informational.

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:13 by Paper 20

every school is different. Also difficult to discuss so many topics in one hour.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:13 by Paper 20

open forum questions would have been helpful. wasted time.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 23:14 by Paper 20

fun and thought provoking.

Cloud server hosting by Combell Combell      © Joind.in 2012