M4.06 - Is this Credit Legit?

James Patton (21.Feb.2011 at 14:15)
Talk at SACRAO 2011 (English - US)

Rating: 3 of 5

SESSION ROOM: GEORGIA 13

Who are you?

Claim talk

By clicking this button you are declaring that you are the speaker responsible for it and a claim request will be sent to the administrator of the event.

If the claim is approved you will be able to edit the information for this talk.

Are you sure?

 
Comments closed.

Comments

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 14:52 by Cyndi hill (8 comments)

Good overview of the many places where transfer hours can come from and how to deal with them.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:39 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

good introduction to the trust credit process.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:41 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

very short and very broad overview. this was a transfer 101 presentation as opposed to a detailed look at this. as such, it was good, but not what i expected. the q&a part was very valuable-turned into a transfer credit forum, which was nice.

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:44 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

very high level-very brief-but friendly, approachable presenter. needed more depth and substance in the presentation.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:44 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:44 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:44 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:45 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:45 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:48 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

very basic info-was hoping for more advanced info.

Rating: 5 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:48 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:49 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:49 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

good exchange of info

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:49 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

not as in depth as it could have been.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:50 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

not as in depth as it could have been.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:50 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

basic info

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:51 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

pleased, but very basic.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:51 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:51 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:51 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

very straight forward. nice review. good questions.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:54 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

need session that deals with accreditation other than regional.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:54 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

very informative

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:54 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

presenter was concise, but short. group discussions was good.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:55 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

interesting but not enough prepared content.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:55 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

need more tips on what to look out for.
common cases, senerios.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:55 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

fairly rudimentary for most registrars.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:56 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:56 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

introductory and brief overview of trans credit. did not seem consistent with description which should have been more advanced and in depth.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:57 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:57 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:57 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

great overview of sticky transfer evaluations.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:58 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

needs to speak loudly, would have as he ended his sentence. session was 15 minutes.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:58 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

need to have more information. session too short.

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:59 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

really didn't learn a whole lot of new info. presenter moved through presentation in 15 min. too short. should have more info.

Rating: 4 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 16:59 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 17:00 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

very obvious-2 years of transfer experience.
would be more helpful to have someone with more experience and includes move volume of transfer students.

Rating: 2 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 17:01 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

would have been more beneficial if presenter had more than 2 years of experience at an institution that only has 2500 students.
presenter unable to answer a lot of questions. audience doing consensus of who does what.

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 17:02 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

none

Rating: 3 of 5

21.Feb.2011 at 17:02 by Paper 13 (38 comments)

well organized-good speaker. however no new info being presented.

© Joind.in 2014