T1.07 - Automating the Transient Letter Request Process

Denny Savage (22.Feb.2011 at 08:00)
Talk at SACRAO 2011 (English - US)

Rating: 4 of 5

SESSION ROOM: ATLANTA 4

The University of Alabama has successfully implemented an automated request system for letters of transiency. The session will discuss how UA moved from a manual process that required 1,600-2,000 man hours per year, to an automated process allowing the student to have a transient letter in hand within two minutes. This automation has freed up resources across campus while enabling our students to help themselves by expediting their enrollment in transient institutions.

Who are you?

Claim talk

By clicking this button you are declaring that you are the speaker responsible for it and a claim request will be sent to the administrator of the event.

If the claim is approved you will be able to edit the information for this talk.

Are you sure?

 
Comments closed.

Comments

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 08:28 by Baz (6 comments)

Good presentation. Would have also liked the technical side. But the benefits shown were fantastic. Excellent example of automation benefits.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:09 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:09 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

informative and engaging

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:09 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

good presentation on an interesting topic.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:11 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

very well presented. great idea. i can see other similar processes that could use this type of application. UA should submit this in Banner commons to make it available to other banner users and considered for INB.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:11 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:11 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

none

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:12 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

excellent

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:12 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

good information on what 1 school could move to. Thanks.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:12 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

good information.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:13 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

good information on the topic. Try to make it a little longer and more about how other institutions could adapt a similar online process.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:13 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

none

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:13 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

none

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:13 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

very good information.

Rating: 3 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:14 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

some technical content would have been beneficial even if only some basics.

Rating: 4 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:14 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

probably need a technical person as part of presentation.

Rating: 5 of 5

22.Feb.2011 at 09:14 by Paper 32 (131 comments)

none

© Joind.in 2014