08.Oct.2011 at 12:49 by Luke Richards
Good talk. I was hoping for something a bit more technical and in depth. I felt the talk was more of an introduction to Doctrine 2. If that was the intention then it should be clarified in the title of the talk, i.e. 'Doctrine 2 - An introduction'. The talk started slow and got interesting towards the end. I would have liked it to start half way through. I think the examples and descriptions need fleshing out; they felt a little too improvised. If you could flesh them out a little more with concrete well explained examples it would provide a much more confident feel to the talk. As such the exmaples and descriptions lacked clarity. Thanks for the talk.




08.Oct.2011 at 11:29 by nick den breems via api
good talk, nice slides. let's bash everybody responcible for turning your name badge into a math equasion!