What did you like about this event, and what do you think could be better for the next time? Leave your feedback to help the organizers know what you liked, and what could be improved on.


Comments are closed

Samuele Lilli at 19:29 on 26 May 2017

Nice conference: very good location and very good organized.
Just one thing: please provide a better website for next year (see what Matteo Moretti says in his commend) and, please, bring back the "beginner - intermediate - advanced" advice in the schedule: it was really good! :)

Blake Newman at 03:00 on 14 May 2017

Great event!

Overall talk standard was brilliant.

Speakers were treated well, and attendees felt comfortable enough to approach and form conversation.

Loved that people could give feedback, however I feel there may have been more if it was anomonous and it was not viewable publicly until organisers released.

Food was great during day, social events where awesome. Not much i could fault, only a few technical issues which is no one's fault, to rectify I would have ensured there was more microphones.

Hope all had fun... I certainly did :)

M_a_s_s_i at 12:14 on 12 May 2017

Excellent event, as usual :-)

I have a couple of suggestions:

- Maybe it was me, but on the web site I was unable to jump from a talk in the schedule page to its full description on the talks page. When I need to chose which track to follow at any given slot, I start from the schedule page but I need to see the talk descriptions to decide. Putting a link...

- When you select talks, require speakers to state clearly in the description if what they are presenting is related to the services of a single vendor. It's not that those talks are "bad" in principle (they *can* be great!), it's that attendees might like to know it in advance. In this case I am thinking about the "chatbots" talk, which was Cisco specific but did not state so.

But this is just nitpicking.
As I said, the event has been fantastic!

Good conference. I'll surely come back next year. Well organized, very good food and location.
It's a pity the conf website: the schedule web page does not provide links to talks abstract. It was quite funny to switch back and forth the schedule and talk web pages to find out what the hell a talk is about.

First time coming, very interesting! I would have expected more tracks and talks for a conference with such history and for a such used language, but the overall talk quality was high and I will most probably come back!
About website. The schedule here on joind.in is way better from the UX point of view than the one on jsday.it. That can be Ok, but why no direct link from jsday.it to this site? It was difficult to learn about talks (no link between schedule and abstracts, random order in talks page) until I went to this site.
Great food overall!
About bags, one with longer handles (that can be hanged over the shoulder) may be more versatile.
About directions, track 3 room was not so easy to find.