What was great:
• The introduction curve
• The slides in support (clear, easily readable, simple examples)
• The interaction with the audience. Questions, comments, etc.
What could be better:
• While the english quality was good, the accent and the hesitations pauses made it a bit less easy to follow, but that is very minor.
• I felt like the presentation was more like an introduction. In the synopsis (seen above), it is more hinted as an advanced talk for a familiar audience. Perhaps the content should better match the synopsis.
Comments
Comments are closed.
What was great:
• The introduction curve
• The slides in support (clear, easily readable, simple examples)
• The interaction with the audience. Questions, comments, etc.
What could be better:
• While the english quality was good, the accent and the hesitations pauses made it a bit less easy to follow, but that is very minor.
• I felt like the presentation was more like an introduction. In the synopsis (seen above), it is more hinted as an advanced talk for a familiar audience. Perhaps the content should better match the synopsis.
Thank you for this talk.