Talk comments

@cdamian: sorry if i went too fast, should have reminded everyone to ask questions during the talk to slow me down. btw .. you commented/rated twice.

@root: i am actually very glad to hear that. i always feel like i fail the audience since these days so many slide decks focus a lot on entertainment value, which i am not so keen on delivering.

Anonymous at 19:51 on 4 Jun 2011

Sorry, but the "show" was really a bad idea - you can be "angel" or "devil" just by presenting specific parts of presentation, no need to talk to each other like you did... Besides, I don't think that there was a reason to divide this topic to these two parts - when your website is good for users, it also brings you more profit, not only satisfaction that you're "angel" etc.

Anonymous at 12:37 on 4 Jun 2011

It seemed that this could be done after few days research on google. Too many facts about the company was both boring and useless, ie. the time of testing depends on server configuration, tests, servers used, browser used etc. You could have provided some charts to show these dependencies and not some numbers about your company without any context about configuration.
I lacked expertise on the subject, too.

Well presented keynote covering an interesting topic.

This was one of the most informative and entertaining talks of the IPC/Webinale, covering the topic HTML5.
<bling/>

Nice and informative talk.

We like to be entertained by you.

Thank you for this bright perspective on PHPUnit.

I like that kind of talks, only essential information on the slides, focus on the important facts.