Talk comments

While I still don't feel functional programming is better than imperative one, I really enjoyed this talk. It was zealous, well structured and honest. It didn't enforce hardcore functional programming but shown how small elements of it can improve code. (I was using some of those techniques before, not even knowing that it is a paradigm change - I just considered them to make the code look better.) The speaker was well prepared and the slides were not overloaded with code.

Browomir at 21:39 on 3 Oct 2016

podstawy, ale konkretnie

on Symfony

Definitely the worst talk of the whole conference. There was nothing interesting for anyone who have done at least one legacy project. The behaviour of the speaker was simply disrespectful to few hundreds of attendees and it is not something that should be accepted on a conference aspiring to be the biggest one in Central Europe.

Roman Józwiak at 21:25 on 3 Oct 2016

Podobal mi sie sposob przedstawienia dzia?ania wyszukiwarek tekstowych.
Jak juz wyzej wspomniano, szkoda ze tak krotko. :)

For me it was a bit disapointing talk (considering the speaker giving it). I expected the author to make a more in-depth look into Neo4J. (The abstract for the talks said: 'Zapoznamy się także z metodami współpracy Neo4j z PHP oraz typowymi problemami, przy których dedykowane rozwiązanie pokazuje mocny "pazur" nad implementacją SQL.' however I don't remember any PHP libraries or PHP code being shown, just the standard Neo4j interface plus some open source projects analyzing Packagist manifest files.) The examples given were pretty basic and copy-pasting them line by line didn't add much value - this part could be much shorter to actually show some interesting queries and explain how they work.

Presentation skills from the speaker were great and the talk was witty and enjoyable, but I didn't find much substance in it, unfortunately.