Talk comments

Great talks, clear slides. High five

Timo Bakx at 12:33 on 16 Nov 2017

Good talk. Speaker went through it pretty fast (maybe the talk would have been a bit better if a little more time was available?) Good information of the techniques used.

Timo Bakx at 12:31 on 16 Nov 2017

Decent talk. I was hoping for a bit more in-depth talk about message queues and best practices in how to use them or when to use which type of exchange to use in certain circumstances.
The presentation was clear, but the way of talking could use some practice. Keep up the good work.

Timo Bakx at 12:25 on 16 Nov 2017

Good talk. Very clear. Nice live demo. Can't wait to start with Symfony 4.

on Keynote

Unfortunately this was not an ok talk for such a conference and the advanced track. Like another feedback here, usually the slides are more of a support, not the whole thing you want to present, and in that case they need to be big enough for people to see what is presented, which was not the case even for the people sitting in the first rows.

As a tip, maybe it will help next time to rehearse the presentation before and have everything planned out beforehand, instead of improvising on the spot based on the slides.

jan rosicky at 12:21 on 16 Nov 2017

I was expecting more about msg. queue implementation, it was mostly about fundamentals

As usual, well presented and obviously well prepared. I especially liked how Nicolas did the live coding part in tandem to the talk - great idea !

However, I have to hold one point hostage here, as the keynote was (again, as usual) too long. And all talks should be rated on how well they manage their time budget - no matter I much we like the speaker ;)

on Keynote

This talk was interesting as it offered insight in tools and best practises. However, given its context (in the advanced slot) it somehow missed its goal. It's a great introductory talk for sure (given the talks beginning and pace). It's just not advanced.(-1) Also the talk's title "Decoupling an application with message queues" suggested more architectural insight and content than what was actually delivered. (-1)

For whatever it is worth though, the slides and the speaker where both pretty good.

Hugo Hamon at 11:59 on 16 Nov 2017

Great talk about ES & CQRS that goes further than just the basic level. Thanks for all valuable information.