Mes recommendations mentionnés durant la formation:
Architecture CSS:
LE MUST SEE:
- http://smacss.com/
- http://www.slideshare.net/nataliedowne/css-systems-presentation
- http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/
- http://simianuprising.com/2012/02/28/dry-css-slides-from-my-confoo-2012-talk/
SI VOUS AVEZ JAMAIS LU:
- http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors/
ACCESSIBILITÉ, FORMATION, RÉFÉRENCE:
- http://certif.accessibiliteweb.com/accueil/base-de-connaissances/
POLYFILL, Mes préférés:
- http://css3pie.com/
SIMILAIREMENT INSPIRANT:
MES NOTES SUR MON EXPERIENCE:
- http://www.slideshare.net/renoirb/how-to-manage-a-big-scale-htmlcss-project
RÉFÉRENCES SUR LE SUJET:
- http://www.slideshare.net/stubbornella/what-is-object-oriented-css
- http://www.slideshare.net/stubbornella/the-cascade-grids-headings-and-selectors-from-an-oocss-perspective-ajax-experience-2009
- http://www.slideshare.net/stubbornella/the-cascade-grids-headings-and-selectors-from-an-oocss-perspective-ajax-experience-2009
UN OEIL VERS LE FUTUR:
- CSS4 :) http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/
- Mobile application development en verison Libre http://incubator.apache.org/cordova/
Learned a few things in this talk! Good talk!
Congratulations Eric!!! You're the BEST... as usually =)!
Great talk and very easy to follow. The code examples were spot on and not too generic.
Lori did a great job of presenting the new features of Rails 3.1 and I was really excited to see the demos of upgrading from 2.x to 3.1. A lot of great info for people moving to 3.1 in this talk!
I feel Jeremy is a good speaker and interacts with the audience well.
The content of the talk is where I have my biggest disagreements with. He mentioned OOCSS once, but never really elaborated how his strategy to DRY utilizes it. Some of his strategies seemed to contradict OOCSS. He told the audience to ignore the class naming, which I felt was a good teaching point to drive home why he made those naming decisions.
This topic or style of talk is necessary at every topic. It was truly a guide of resources people should be using or researching. I echo the statements from above: Inspiring!
I have to agree with the above statements. I felt like the information provided was very generic and added no great insight to using HTML5. More time was spent on the history and less on useful information.
I personally like the speakers style and think he is a good speaker, but I felt the content wasn't in depth enough.
Was great, it was too general, but as an intro/first session and not knowing much about HTML5, was good enough.
Andrew is a good speaker, he wasn't boring at all.