Talk comments

Sven Stolk at 10:24 on 1 Jul 2017

Interesting at first, but was a bit to long to keep my attention.

Dion Snoeijen at 10:21 on 1 Jul 2017

It's a pleasure to listen to Marcello. His energy and knowledge are inspirational and the topic was very interesting. At the end I have to admit I was very much overloaded with information, but that might just be me. Thanks!

Shopware AG at 10:14 on 1 Jul 2017

Straight forward, informative. Great talk.

Jeroen v.d. Gulik at 10:14 on 1 Jul 2017

Excellent talk about all the issues that arise when changing the schema on a live database with several strategies to deal with them.

Pulkit Swarup at 23:44 on 30 Jun 2017

I was looking forward to an introduction to the topic and what better than this. Probably, amongst the few presentation where the topic and slides were actually in sync in terms of expectations

Pulkit Swarup at 23:41 on 30 Jun 2017

The concept/topic was totally new to me, which made it interesting clubbed along with presentation skills of Chris. I would say I liked this talk the most.

Pulkit Swarup at 23:39 on 30 Jun 2017

An average talk. Could have been better.

Pulkit Swarup at 23:37 on 30 Jun 2017

The presenter was highly enthusiastic about the topic and that was clearly visible during his presentation.

It would have been really nice if the slides were prepared for the presentation covering important topics and demo, rather than referring old slides used for training, maybe within the company or other event's

Pulkit Swarup at 23:32 on 30 Jun 2017

Didn't meet my expectations, I was looking forward to problems faced by programmers and technical solutions to them. Solutions to problems like different s/w requiring different versions of a library/application. IMO, the presentation was more focused on dos and don'ts functionally

Pulkit Swarup at 23:23 on 30 Jun 2017

Talking about SOLID Principles and choosing the right examples to explain the principles is a really tricky.

Although, the presentation started on a right note picking up principles which are least understood and discussed, but there is a reason i.e. the right examples and that was precisely which was missing.