OpenWest 2015
6 - 9 May 2015 at Utah Valley University

Well done presentation. A little light on the motivation. The demonstration did well to show the breadth of tools but left some unanswered questions

One of the best presentations of the entire conference. Had a great balance of teaching about the topic as well as demostrating it in action. Well done!

Thanks for your feedback, Jarrod. I'll make the title a lot more clear for future use, and will try to avoid similar mistakes.

Good presentation. The presenter made the excellent point that different people excel at different types of interviews and the people doing the interview need to find ways to get the most out of the interview, while taking into consideration the personality of the person being interviewed. And might I add, that it is about time that somebody noticed that white-board coding during an interview is a terrible idea! Bravo for making that point!

Some good points, but could have been said in half the time.

Good presentation, but I agree with a previous comment about age discrimination being a horrible problem with older IT professionals. Therefore, my older age needs to be the biggest variable in choosing an employer to work for, and switching employers every 3 to 5 years is not possible for older workers.

The rest of the presentation was useful.

Good presentation. I knew nothing about TypeScript before this presentation, and after having attended the presentation, I feel I have had a good introduction to it. The presenters were obviously knowledgeable and prepared and took the time to make a good presentation.

Good overview of important programs. Useful information that inspired me to look into the programs with which I am not as familiar. Fluid speaking style, kept our attention. Would attend again.

Thanks for the feedback. The transition from architecture to Ioflo was abrupt. I will fix that in the future. I am working on a simpler non robotic example.

Enjoyed the talk especially the explanation of the source of vulnerability in SSL and SSH as sign before encrypt or sign and encrypt versus sign after encrypt.

In the future I suggest using CurveCP as a reference design for how to do end to end encryption correctly. Why CurveCP is best practices (or not)

Could you please post a link to the slides.