Talk comments

I read the PHP internals book two weeks ago so this was a nice rehearsal, with some complementary material! It would be awesome if you found a way for that extra information to get into the internals book.

Great talk. SPL indeed has a lot of weird stuff going on which basicly can only be uncovered by looking at the source. Like Ayame said, the talk wasn't demotivating at all. Might even get me to pick it up again ;-)

This talk was much more vivid and entertaining compared to his previous talks I attended at PHPBenelux. Overall it was a good talk, though at some point there was some confusion as to what the actual recommended best practices were. Maybe this could be made more clear, considering the fact that best practices also depend on the circumstances and requirements (which I think was the source of the confusion).

Awesome stuff. Personal top 3 ranking @ this years event.

This should have been part of the main schedule :-)

Good CMF introduction. Very well prepared. I already knew a lot of the theory from Youtube and the docs, so I personally would have liked to have more hands on. But I guess time was too limited for that. I love the fact that we have good demo code.

I agree with Michael. A bunch of colleagues and myself just started to explore Vagrant a bit, so we have some basic knowledge of its capabilities and potential. So for me personally the zooming in on provisioners was exactly what I was looking for (Shame I missed the Ansible talk the next day though). Live demo would've been nice but, in my opinion, isn't required. Overall great talk, keep it up!

Great technical talk, especially for a novice in Postgres. As stated before, the presentation showed exactly what it has to offer in dealing with schema-less data. I personally missed the 'why choose Postgres' part though. Could be a wrong expectation on my part though.

Clear and practical talk about Ansible, it's features and workings. Recommended.

Nice talk. Despite it being a beginner level session, it was quite informative. Personally I would've liked a bit more depth in the recognition part.