Fun introduction with a good and concise information.
Well deliver talk about a deep subject like Dependency Injection. Code examples were clear and added to the talk, but I have to indeed agree with my fellow 'feedbackers' here that the presentation could do without the explanation of the DI packages. Nevertheless, a good talk.
Very interesting talk and well presented. Am likely to try it out in the near future. If I have to say one 'bad' thing about the talk : sometimes the comparison between PHP and other languages was taken too far to be really relevant anymore. Not to say it wasn't interesting, but it was perhaps too much. But for the rest a very good talk (and now I've read you didn't have much time in preparing it)
A typical Matthias Noback talk : fun, interesting and refreshing. It was nice to see a talk being not all about code examples and demo's, but just a 'talk' about something we all have to deal with.
A good talk overall, found it at times a bit hard to follow, but I'm sure the early morning hours had something to do with that :)
Great talk, I always love hearing case studies and 'how we did' talks.
For 5*:
- this was not my 1st time listening to Jordi, I feel like speakers accent has become stronger, making it a bit harder to understand
- some of the slides had lot of facts which made it harder to follow as I switched from listening to reading whats on the slides
Not connected to the talk but to the subject, maybe you should look to give ops bit more focus (or hire a dedicated dev-ops person), it felt due to fear of managing your own things when there is no one-click AWS support lots of 'hacking' was done on the apps to get things running. (Sorry for digressing)
Brilliant talk, it's amazing how we don't learn from the history: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
As a person who never worked with k8's I found this talk very interesting: from introduction to the kubernetes terminology to demos of how it works.
Speaker was clear and easy to understand, only 'complaint' I have: I think he tried to do too much with demos and it was a bit hard to follow at demo time.
For 5*: try to do less jumping from screen to screen, creating new clusters and than going back and forth as it was hard to follow.
BTW. I loved how you added commands you ran to the presentation so we can all later easily use them but would find a better way of organizing the slides so you dont have to skip thru all of them after the demo.
I felt the talk was bit disconnected: lot of theory & philosophy on one hand and personal disappointment stories on the other. This made the whole talk have a 'depressing' vibe.
In my experience, 'legacy' can be terrible code but I dont like labelling bad code with 'legacy' stickers by default: it's just bad code.
For 5* I would like to hear a few positive stories as well, at least how a depressing one from speakers experience was converted to a happy one.
Good talk with quite a few different subjects (history , 7.3 & 7.4 , some tooling).
The 7.3 and 7.4 part was still fun to follow even I was aware of most of it.
The CO2 part felt a bit rushed/glossed over. This is a big and valid point and I feel you didn't give it enough time or maybe even passion. But still an excellent move to mention it. I hope it inspired more people to share their solutions.