Talk comments

Andy Roid at 18:35 on 6 Dec 2016

Lack of alternatives solutions and boring exposition penalized this interesting topic

Andy Roid at 18:27 on 6 Dec 2016

focused on promotion of new stuff

on Keynote

E Ciotti at 00:57 on 6 Dec 2016

I'd have liked to have a title saying clearly it was about types (I couldn't read the online description due to bad wifi in the building), and to hear more about the benefits of automatic casting, e.g. when reading/sending data over HTTP. Apart from that, high quality talk

E Ciotti at 00:25 on 6 Dec 2016

A talk should either teach something not obvious, or inspire. This talk achieved the former.
I give a 5 stars to counterbalance the other votes. The quantity of the content fit well the timeslot and was reasonably well explained considering the needed tech-detailed jargon

David Zuelke at 19:48 on 5 Dec 2016

Thank you all for your feedback! I'll definitely incorporate a comparison with AMQP, MQTT, PubSub etc. for a future iteration, at least for session formats that allow it time wise (can't always do it all within 40 minutes unfortunately).

Slides with a few fixes and additions are now in the details too. Enjoy!

Very good speaker, but I did not get the purpose of this talk

Good speaker and good presentation. We had a very cool overview. It's was very dynamic.
More beautiful slides would have been better ;)

The speaker and the talk was good. But I miss few things: How does it compare to others tools similar (rabbitmq) and what are the common pitfalls and best practice.

IMHO, you should add some summary after each big topic. And an initial "previously on ..." would have been nice for new comers