Talk comments

Really liked the different look on programming languages from the developer perspective, by trying to better error messages.
The talk to me was a bit theoretical, which required me to pay full attention the whole time. One of the reasons for that, was me not being familiar with the language and concepts.
Even though, the speaker did try to make the concepts clear for everybody. Big plus for that!
A point of improval would be to add some more 'breaks', like a quick summary of few extra jokes in between.
Other then that, excellent talk!

Great keynote to spark some though. While I do not fully agree on all points made, It does encourage placing yourself in the person on the other side of the internet (the contributors).
Huge +1 on trying to get rid of ego. And thanks for making me rethink about open source licenses.

Great talk, especially considering it was a last-minute kind of thing.

IgorĀ“s talks are always good, and this one on computability was no exception. The talk was well paced and structured.

For people that want to explore the gates, adders, etc. part I recommend the nand2tetris course (http://www.nand2tetris.org/course.php). It's a lot of fun.

A great inspiring keynote. Perfect for a start of a conference.

Anonymous at 18:45 on 16 Nov 2015

Well what can I say. Its Igor. So I had high hopes which he totally met! Great talk that was fun and interesting in every aspect. Not a single moment left me distracted. It was well paced, touching and academic. I really felt like I learned something. Keep up the good work Igor. You're an amazing speaker!

Anonymous at 18:42 on 16 Nov 2015

Great talk. Though scheduling could've been better. It would have been a great talk to have seen _after_ the parsers talk as they seemed to complement each other a lot.

Anonymous at 18:40 on 16 Nov 2015

Controversial talk. Good for a keynote. It really fired up some interesting discussions during lunch.

Good talk. Like the concept of a discussion, it is really hard to pull of, so credits for taking this approach. Could be made better by providing examples for the arguments both parties are using to make their respective points.