Talk comments

Deniz Zoeteman at 20:40 on 1 Jul 2017

Great talk, the enthusiasm definitely came off! I don't know quite yet how I'd apply this over other things like Angular in production, but it's fun for sure.

Sander Zegveld at 20:38 on 1 Jul 2017

The title of the talk sounded awesome but unfortunately the presentation wasn't. It was not boring but had at least expect some stories of working at a nuclear facility while coding or some examples how to code secure but neither of that. A disappointment. The way of presenting was good and decent, so the spear should certainly not change the style of presenting, just the things he is showing/telling could be a lot more interesting for a PHP conference.

Deniz Zoeteman at 20:38 on 1 Jul 2017

Okay talk, was interesting to hear these opinions, and I agree on some points. However, it would have been nice to have some solutions given to the problems talked about.+

Solid talk. Very comfortable speaking style.

Deniz Zoeteman at 20:36 on 1 Jul 2017

Pretty good talk! Got to learn quite a lot about the PHP lexer, parser and compiler!

Sander Zegveld at 20:34 on 1 Jul 2017

great talk - interesting and entertaining, the highlight of the day

I feel like this talk had all the bases covered. I now know what GraphQL is and why I would want to use it. I definitely think there is room for improvement though. Your speaking style did not feel comfortable and I missed some structure. Perhaps you could have also delved a little deeper into implementation specifics and characteristics of the resolvers.

The amount and speed of information felt just right. The speaker felt very comfortable and knowledgeable about the topic.

Great talk. I think it fit in well with the other talks about 'soft' skills without overlapping. I think the anecdotes were the strongest part of this talk. Your great presentation style also helps tremendously.

@hgraca I'm very sorry to have disappointed you. My talk revolved around the idea that (micro)service architecture shouldn't be dismissed as easily as it usually is. I did an awful lot of research trying to make sure I get all the aspects right, while writing a book about it, because I noticed that people are making big mistakes in their architectural decisions.
I explicitly did not make this a book-selling talk. I didn't even have a slide about it, because I was afraid to get this kind of feedback. But, I would be crazy not to mention it. To be clear: I don't get any money for speaking at DPC. In fact, I work literally hundreds of hours for free to speak at events like DPC. I hope this gives a bit more context.