Not exactly clear what was the intended message. It was funny and interesting as a morning intro (yet the 1 hour coffee break right afterwards made me seriously regret getting up early enough for it)
Very interesting talk, presenting many concepts that go against community standards and best practices, but there is a valid reasoning behind each and every one of them which was clearly communicated. Love to see people ding things differently and thus figuring out new methodologies to achieve the goals (e.g. 'e' escaping test)
The contents of the talks were great and thought-provoking. Their relevance to the title was somewhat weak. And the technical issues, I'd expect, should have been tested/resolved before the talk.
This was unexpectedly useful and practical. Very well presented with great confidence and easy answers to a longer-than-usual Q&A session.
Very poor talk content-wise. There were a few problems raised, but no solutions given. The only valuable thing to bring home from the talks was that 'infrastructure is not fixed anymore'. Yet this was reiterated in the next days keynote anyway. It was funny, but not value for money.
Hi Joshua,
The 2stars was more about the relevance of the talk - not how it was presented. I thought the talk was really good (presented), but I didn't really find how (or why) it was useful to me in a world of composer, etc. - so yes, more about the how and why really.
Excellent talk with some super useful tools thrown in to boot. Presented well, clear and concise. Really enjoyed this one.
Interesting and useful. Good to know that bothering about low level optimizations is pretty much a waste of time. Unless you're Facebook.