Talk comments

Great talk! I found the introduction including the history of string encoding very interesting. I find it really useful to understand why things are the way they are. The examples used throughout the presentation were well chosen, easy to understand and documented well the point to be made. The talk ended with some very practical tips and best practices. Very useful. Joeri also presented well. The presentation was fun, enganging, well organized and easy to follow. Thanks for the talk.

Nice to hear about AI on the PHP conference. I had not expected that :)

The subject of the talk could have been presented a bit more deeply: the names of the people working on strong AI were mentioned, but not what they were doing exactly. Would have liked to hear about it.

The talk appeared to be about the speaker's private AI project. Which is ok, just name the talk: please help me with my AI project ;) I would still visit it.

The subject was way to broad; all of strong AI is too much for a 30 minute discussion. Please narrow it down next time.

The speaker reacted well to responses in the audience, which were unexpectedly informative, by the way.

Speaker, please keep doing this!

First conference talk? The speaker was born to do this!

The talk was very rich in content, gave a beautiful historical overview of the subject (not too long to my taste, not at all!), it was funny, and the practical tips were very useful. The speaker gave the impression of authority on the subject. The information on collation in Javascript and MySQL were very welcome.

Speaker, please continue to give presentations!

The contents was presented in a clear manner, the speaker is obviously very capable.

In the presentation I would have like to hear more about the differences between the traditional design process and the one using ubiquitous language (isn't it only natural that domain-specific concepts are reflected in the code?). The same holds for code: I would have liked to see some examples of the differences between code not using UL and one with UL. Also: how about using factories, repositories, design patterns, would they all need to be rephrased in business-language? If not, where is the dividing line?

Very good to hear about this subject, though. Please do go on!

Chris' talk was a great reminder that there's a lot more to just shipping an application in a timely fashion and made me want to look at the OWASP guides again. Also, Chris has a very pleasant voice, so I believe he could talk about anything and still make for a very, very good presentation.

More of this stuff please :)

Good speaker, very well prepared. Sadly, the content of this talk was just not that interesting.

Great talk!

I couldn't understand certain words in your sentences (I can't really put a finger on it). It didn't happen all the time and it wasn't a big problem. It might've been a situational thing that you usually don't do, you mentioned talking two days straight in workshops.

Good introduction to CQRS for newbies. However, the introductory description of the talk seems to be a bit misleading about the actual topic. I expected the talk would focus more on task based UI design, with a lot of practical examples, the dos and don'ts, maybe some deeper insights on how to handle concurrent editing, updating the UI when using an asynchronous command bus, etc. Maybe my expectations were just too high :)

Maybe a bit to much accent on Hack, but given the speaker background, perfectly understandable. New features and structures were well explained.