Same oppinion as the others. you do awsome things, but this keynote wasn't one of them.
the few lines of code for bootstrapping sf1 in sf2 are interesting and a strange idea by the way.
To improve the talk : source code IN the slides and IN the presentation would have been appreciated (the approach seemed mystic to me and unclear until i looked at the source code)
Surprisingly, even while knowing what an AMQP is, stupidly, i wasn't thinking about using it to scale my batch processes wich is a great idea...
Your slides were good, you were great, keep going.
It says : "we'll look at JavaScript optimizations in greater detail." and we didn't (i choosed this session, just because of that phrase)
Anyway i'm rating your session pretty well, because of the nice slides and your dynamism, and not rating it too well because everything was really really not deep enought (too basic)
It waked me up and it was damn hard.
really awsome speaker, steve balmer Jr ? :)
You were dynamic, your talk was ok, but there is things you can improve ;)
- I was confortable with nearly all the tools you talked about, but i'm thinking about thoses who are not. and i think they probably didn't learned anything usefull as they still dont know why SolR and not (MyIsam + fulltext) or why continuous integration over nothing etc... so maybe you should focus on less things and deeper ?
- You said that if someone do not like webservices, he can use Xapian because there is a pecl extension. Since not so long, there is as well a SolR pecl extension.
Anyway the good point is you are a good speaker so keep going, good luck for the next talks man. and i hope your wife recived some tweets like you said ;)
Really good talk. Not a great english, so I really appreciated the effort. Thanks.
not as good as expected
freaking good man, template engines are so boring: this talk made twig funny!
Damn good talk ! i learned and i'm happy and now i have to read the http bis specification that i admit i never heard about that before.
Keep going.