Dutch PHP Conference 2011
19 - 21 May 2011 at Amsterdam RAI

Good and clear presentation, a bit slow sometimes, otherwise, well done.

Good talk, interesting patterns. I still like the active record pattern, no matter what. But I will try if I can generate code for a data mapper pattern. Don't want to be writing all of that by hand.

Good explanation of the smart way to do dependency-injection using lazy initialization. To bad Marsman still doesn't get the closures.

I agree with the others that there was a bit to much hand raising, but you'll have taken that point by now :). I would recommend removing a few of those questions to the audience in favor of another: Who would have liked to see some UML diagrams? Instead of asking who likes the fact that they are missing. Personally I find UML diagrams a good means of communication. One picture...

Good interaction, nice opinions and point of view. It would have been nice to also have some more examples of good comments, and where they _are_ appropriate.

I agree to most of the above. You had a lot to tell and just couldn't tell it all. Yes we would have appreciated a bit more php, but comet doesn't seem to be much about php specifically by nature. All those urls in one slide, indeed, that doesn't make much sense. It doesn't stick, but we can look them up in your slides afterwards.

Very disappointing, sounded like the speaker was just reading Wikipedia articles on the topic. Way to little detail and depth to be usable in practice.

Talk was well done. However I thought that this talk would be more a general talk how to set it all up instead of the specific problem you covered.

Besides that, I love the way you present. Would for sure attend another talk of you if I'm able to

Very nice talk, I liked the pragmatic viewpoint.

Very interesting talk. Would have liked to see some more about real-world configurations however.

Great talk. Learnt some new stuff that will help us profiling our applications better.

Bit of an incoherent talk. Two very different parts, where both were probably only well-understandable for people who knew the topic anyway. Also, the accent made it more difficult to follow.