Talk comments

Great talk! Using HTML hyperlinks to compare to Hypermedia API's is really clever and makes the talk easier to follow.

I really, really liked your keynote Jordi!

It was very down to earth and brought with enough humor and truths.
It showed perfectly what you (or any open source maintainer) has to endure when doing this. It has opened my eyes and now I even have more respect for people like you.

It also gave me incentive to go and do some more OSS work in the future.

I liked that the talk showed a part of the history of computing.
It was not really what I expected, but liked it anyway.

Good speaker who knows what he is talking about.

Also nice to know how to calculate logarithms without a calculator ;-)

I did not attend the talk, but wanted to point out that it was great that you had a slide up explaining who the talk was for, and for who it was not!

It was a fun start when you used the characters to illustrate the different tests. But actually I found it only confusing and unnecessary.

When you got to the testing itself, it became much more clearer. I liked the personal input and the examples were very clear.

This talk made me evaluate my own testing experience and made me want to dive in some more!

I was expecting a slightly different talk about this subject. Especially given the description provided.

Overall I was glad that I followed it, but would like to have seen some more in-depth examples and documentation.

Good speaker with the needed experience. The talk was well prepared and easy to follow.

It was a great starting point for setting up your own CI and CD.
Loved the personal notes and experience of the speaker.

Nice talk that covers most of the default features of phpstorm.
I would like to see some more in-depth feature examples and how to best use them. Eg. the refactoring methods, generating constructors etc...

Really liked the talk personally, as these are subjects i'm really interested in. Mark explained well in a simple way how some (of the more complex) data structures work, without relying too much on code (i think implementation should be simple enough for yourself once they are explained). Too bad there was not enough time for the last few (which imho are the most interested ones).

Hey all,

So main conclusion is that the level was a bit too basic. Normally this would be "punished" by a low star rating, so I guess that indeed you'd like the presentation on itself, just it was not what was expected.

I would *love* to go more in-depth in this material (and actually, i have some talks that do that), so hopefully I will see you (again) in such a more advanced presentation next year :)