Talk comments

Great presentation Alvaro, the examples on the simulator were ilustratives.

I was able to pair up with Lukas Smith. I think i also would like to call attention to the other top devs around, I think it would be more profitable for newcomers or the community to have them more accessible during these times. It is probably the time in which coders get together side to side and can learn lot more than from slides. I hope we can pay attention to this more for the upcoming conferences. I am not complaining just saying that for me the 99% of the conference learning was done at the hackathon. Lukas is a great example to follow as a FOSS educator.

yeah I am sorry man but i will give you one. You can deliver a great talk, i understand you were probably tired already. I myself was confused because by CMS I was expecting you to talk about CMF and to land with code and architecture and maybe the overall picture too in a more concrete manner. I know CMF is intertwined with CMS and probably the components would have been more expanded like CreateJs, etc. I am sure the second version is going to rock.

Paul Jones sat with me after the talk and explained me the architecture of the console component in Aura, we talked about Symfony console component and zend framework console implementation and a comparative architecture. I understood very clear what is the difference between a service locator and dependency injection. Paul was probably the best speaker of the conference imo and eager to teach and communicate well to the community.

One of the best talks!

great talk, and you did touch on radbundle which was good. The problem was with the title, i almost did not go because of it, but i am glad i went to your talk even though the title did not give away the actual subject. I like that it was symfony related. Hard maybe for the beginner, but good for the symfony newcomer. Maybe too basic, as Raul pointed out, for the advanced developer. But it is hard to have it for everybody. Also the offer of writing maintainable code was not exemplified extensively although there were examples in the talk. Good speed, maybe some more structure. Good job man!

I wished we could have had a more technical dev type talk, this is what we devs come to hear and learn from. If we want to include these type then that could have been relegated to a lighting talk. We need more technical talks, more FOSS emphasis imo.

sometimes all drinks were cold and coffee was not available :(

There was a problem with the naming EventManager typehint which was named $events that needed a proper naming. Other than that good introduction and great communicator. The introduction was too long, I wished I had seen more code and explanation in terms of how the api tools work and how decisions were taken.

I think it was great, wished there was a second part tutorial next time so that we can do a full blast theory part and 3 more hours on hands on coding on a project like gushbot :)
thanks a lot man and we will keep working online.

it was excellent however i wish we could have had more time to dive into the other repos that were left more as homework. I learned a lot.